United Nations is a hot bed of sexual abuse and whistle blowers are punished rather than protected

United Nations is a hot bed of sexual abuse and whistle blowers are punished rather than protected

Spread the word
  • 6

The UN claims to be a watchdog of violations of human rights throughout the world, but cannot even stop its own staff from committing atrocities to include rape, human trafficking and pedophilia. If you have not yet seen the movie, “The Whistleblower” starring Rachel Weisz, please do so.  It is a story based on the very real experiences of Kathryn Bolkovac, an American police officer who in 1999 was assigned to serve as a peacekeeper with the United Nations in post-war Bosnia.

The movie can be seen in its entirety for free on Youtube.

Government Accountability Project, by Bea Edwards, September 20, 2017

In recent days, the Secretary General of the United Nations and the US president have both made statements about the need to protect whistleblowers at the UN.

Unfortunately, we’ve heard this before – many, many times. The United Nations produces megabytes of rhetoric per second, to little effect. There are statements, press releases, speeches, resolutions, bulletins, policies and announcements of “Zero-Tolerance” and “Human Rights Up Front.” Notable in this category of noise is something called “The Leadership Dialogues” that the former Ethics Officer designed just before she retired with full benefits, but just after she was exposed for improper collaboration with management on a cover-up of child rape and retaliation in Africa.

Now, however, Secretary General Guterres is admitting what whistleblowers have told him for years about child sex abuse. For the first time, he acknowledges that pedophilia and sex abuse are a problem among UN civilian staff; these crimes are not confined to peacekeeping troops. Civilian staff members, of course, are subject to UN discipline and their actions can be addressed by UN management.


When the scandals around child sex abuse emerged in 2015, the UN claimed it was doing everything possible to address the issue, but prosecution of alleged abusers was difficult because the peacekeepers accused were not under UN command. UN management kicked responsibility over to the national governments that supplied the offending troops. The fact that UN staff members were among the alleged abusers was typically omitted from consideration.

Just the tip of the iceberg

The US delegation was little help in addressing the problem. Isobel Coleman, the US Representative at the UN for Management and Reform, sat before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in April 2016, and earnestly explained the bureaucratic complications of disciplining peacekeeping troops under the command of a sovereign nation. (Please read her linked statement. It is a misleading monstrosity of doublespeak.)

By contrast, UN whistleblower Miranda Brown testified at the same committee hearing, arguing that the UN could discipline its own staff members if found guilty in internal processes, but does not. In the absence of UN discipline, there is little political pressure on troop-contributing countries to hold their own forces accountable. The Member States often take their cues from the UN Secretariat on governance issues. Ms. Brown, by the way, lost her job at the UN – which is what happens to whistleblowers there. She was forced out of the UN’s World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) after briefing the US Mission at UN/Geneva on the shipment of sophisticated US IT equipment to North Korea. The US government did not effectively defend her.

In the end, we tire of this. The last UN Secretary General deplored and lamented child sex abuse. He reported himself to be anguished and ashamed, but did nothing meaningful. He named a panel to review the problem, fired someone who was not really responsible for what happened, and appointed a Special Representative (from the reliable roster of former UN political appointees). The whistleblowers were forced out of the UN. One resigned in disgust. Ms. Brown was transferred from Geneva to Fiji to fill a post that she could not assume.

So what is to be done? It’s simple but not easy. The whistleblowers who disclose the abuses must be protected in order to ensure that they and others continue to come forward. The real dimensions of the problem must be recognized. The UN must waive diplomatic immunity for its staff members accused of sex crimes.

It’s straightforward, but the UN must follow through, and not just talk about it. The US Mission must do the same.

Saudi Arabia’s authorities have displayed their ruthless commitment to the use of the death penalty as a weapon to crush dissent and neutralize political opponents,” said Samah Hadid, Director of campaigns for the Middle-East at Amnesty international.

Editor’s Note: On 20 September 2015, the United nations appointed H.E. Mr. Faisal bin Hassan Trad of Saudi Arabia to head the U.N.’s Human Rights Panel.

This appointment angered many international human rights advocates due to Saudi Arabia’s shameful record of public executions (beheadings), women’s rights violations and their intolerance of political dissidents.   JS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Translate »
Scroll Up